Horsham: 4th March 2025
(Published on The Crossblog 30th April)
You may come across a reference in a commentary or sermon to an aspect of Mark’s style which we call the ‘Markan Sandwich’. This is a literary device in which the writer starts to tell a story. After a short paragraph of introduction, he moves to a second story, before returning to conclude the first narrative. At first glance, the two stories may seem entirely unrelated to each other, but invariably they work together to make or emphasise a point. ‘The middle story nearly always provides the key to the theological purpose of the sandwich.’ (Dr Tim White).

The Sandwich: The ‘Markan sandwich’ device appears 7 times in Mark’s gospel (see the list at the end of this post). In these verses, Mark 11: 12-25, we have a great example. Mark introduces the story of the fig tree which offers no fruit. He then relates the story of Christ clearing the temple, before returning to the conclusion of the story of the fig tree. We’re going to look at each of these stories, but first, let’s look at the link between them.
The Fig Tree: The fig tree should be able to deliver small fruits which would feed Jesus. These are not mature figs, but a kind of bud, referred to as a ‘breba’ in Spain, or a ‘taqsh’ in arabic countries. These small buds, which do not develop into full figs, appear in the cooler months of spring and are edible. They’re not a great delicacy, but if you were hungry, you would eat them.
This tree looks as if it should be capable of producing fruit. On close inspection, it offers nothing.
The Temple: In the Jewish mind, temple was a place of worship and sacrifice. Jesus reacted strongly to the corrupt commercial market which was being held within its’ walls. The market was the only, or at least the most visible, activity in the temple courts.
The temple looked as if it was capable of producing fruit for God, but on close inspection, Jesus found that it was failing in its purpose. The main activity was buying, selling and money changing, with some traders taking advantage of the many pilgrims and visitors.
The Link: Let’s start by noting that the Jews regarded the fig tree as symbolic of Israel. This is rooted in Old Testament imagery.
The fig tree’s fruitfulness is a metaphor for the nation’s blessing and favor from God. Conversely, the absence or destruction of fig trees symbolizes judgment and desolation. (see BibleHub commentary: ‘Symbolism of the Fig Tree)
We’ve already noticed that both the fig tree (which somehow represents Israel) and the temple (which should be the beating heart of Israel) are failing to produce fruit which is at the core of their created purpose. Consequently, both are condemned by Christ. The destruction of the fig tree is immediate. In context, we see a performative parable which prophecies the destruction of the temple. That destruction is just as real and takes place at the hands of the Romans, nearly 40 years later.
The Lesson: In context, these two stories sit perfectly together and contribute to a single purpose. The lesson is simple. The follower of Jesus must produce fruit for the kingdom. That is our purpose. In these performative parables, Jesus criticises those who look as if they are being effective, but in reality they are not. Each of us, and every Church of every generation, needs to sit up and take note.
‘I know your deeds. You have a reputation for being alive, but you are dead!’ (Revelation 3:1)
Richard Jackson, West Sussex: LifePictureUK
For a simple but detailed review of the ‘Markan Sandwich’, see article by Dr Tim White, Professor of Ministry and Theology, Carolina University.
The seven examples of the Markan Sandwich
Mark 5:21-43: The story of Jairus and the woman with the hemorrage;
Mark 6:7-30: The sending out of the Twelve and the death of John the Baptist.
Mark 11:12-21: The condemnation of the fig tree and the clearing of the temple;
Mark 14:1-11: The Plot to kill Jesus, including Judas’ betrayal, and the anointing of Jesus at Bethany
Mark 14:17-31 Christ’s prediction of his betrayal by Judas and Peter, and the Last Supper
Mark 14:53-72 Peter in the courtyard of the High Priest and interrogation of Jesus
Mark 15:40-16:8 The women at the cross and the tomb, and Christ’s body claimed by Joseph of Arimathea



A few days after this exuberant scene, Jesus is arrested, tried and crucified. To us, his death, and the resurrection to come, affirm that He is the Messiah. His journey leads to seismic, universal and eternal change. Light overcomes darkness. The veil over God’s sanctuary is torn. Good triumphs over evil. Life is victorious over death.
The word ‘colt’ can refer to a young horse or a young donkey. Matthew’s version of this story tells us that the ‘colt’ in question was a donkey (
The unthinkable happens. Jesus stops in this busy street and tells someone, I’d like to think it’s James or John, to bring the beggar to him. Throwing aside the tools of his trade, Bartimaeus allows himself to be led to Jesus. Then something even more extraordinary happens.
‘When you come into your glory,’ they ask ‘let us take up position as your closest advisors, seated at your right and your left.’ It sounds incredibly presumptuous. It sounds incredibly prideful. Could they drink the cup he has to drink? Could they face the same baptism? These words mean, could you go through what I have to go through? James and John say yes. These are the men who can’t believe that Jesus is facing imminent death, yet they believe they can walk his path, every step of the way.
I sent my first Valentines Card to a girl in my class at school who I really liked when I was about twelve years old. It was probably one of the most terrifying things I have ever done. Actually buying the card was terrifying enough, but the act of delivering it was even worse. My heart racing, I grabbed the opportunity to drop the card unnoticed into her schoolbag before lessons started whilst she was talking to her friends on the other side of the classroom. I had no idea what was supposed to happen next. Following convention, I had written her name in the card but signed it simply as ‘Your Valentine’. I still remember a sense of disappointment, tinged by a degree of relief, when she opened the card and told her friends that it had come from another boy in my class called Gary White. I’m not sure how Gary felt about it, but I never owned up. In the unlikely event that she remembers that moment, I guess that she probably still believes that Gary White was her first Valentine!
‘Calmly and deliberately he tells the disciples of his coming passion at Jerusalem. One after another He describes all the leading circumstances which will attend to His death. Nothing is reserved. Nothing is kept back.’ (