Horsham: 29th January 2026
The Long Ending of Mark
There are a huge number of ancient manuscripts of Mark’s gospel. In the oldest available versions, the gospel ends at verse 8 with news of the resurrection being brought to the disciples by the women, omitting the long ending recorded in these verses.
In simple terms, the last twelve verses of Chapter 16 are regarded by many biblical scholars as ‘extra verses’ which do not form part of the original Gospel. Some theologians argue that these verses have, at some point, been added, no doubt with good intention, in order to bring the ending of Mark’s Gospel to a ‘better’ ending, more closely into line with Matthew and Luke.
On the other hand, others believe that it is the omission of these verses in those manuscripts we currently regard as the oldest which is the error. They argue that verses 9-20 are part of the original gospel, deliberately omitted for reasons now lost in antiquity.
The arguments deepen further with some theologians arguing in favour of ending at verse 13.
Whatever you think about these ‘extra’ verses, they are commonly referred to as ‘the long ending of Mark’.
9 When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had driven seven demons. 10 She went and told those who had been with him and who were mourning and weeping. 11 When they heard that Jesus was alive and that she had seen him, they did not believe it.
12 Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in the country. 13 These returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either.
14 Later Jesus appeared to the Eleven as they were eating; he rebuked them for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe those who had seen him after he had risen.
15 He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation. 16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. 17 And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”
19 After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God. 20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.
Many, many hours have been expended by scholars and theologians on the study of these last verses of Mark’s Gospel. Their inclusion in or omission from the Gospel has been a matter of controversy throughout Church history.

To be honest I have spent more hours researching these verses than I have most of my other posts, but like many people, including many scholars and reputable preachers more qualified than me, I have no idea whether any or all of these verses form part of the original. Many commentators, including such great names as Calvin, simply present these verses as part of the Gospel text. Others, including Sproul, raise the question of the place of these verses in the Gospel, but go on to analyse the anyway.
End Piece
I am not sure that the technical arguments which underly this debate are particularly helpful to us, and will seem tedious and confusing to many. For me, they raise more questions than answers. In any case, most of the text is replicated in other Gospels. There is no reason to doubt, for example, that Christ gave the Great Commission. The question is simply whether it is rightly placed here in the words offered by Mark. The exception is the handling of poisonous snakes and drinking of poisons. These references may have been important at some point in the past, but neither are tests which I would recommend to test the efficacy of one’s faith.
I’m fascinated by some of the arguments I have read, and left confused by others. In short, after several re-writes, I’ve decided not to summarise any of them here, but rather to signpost below to a few of the more accessible sources for those who are interested and would like to know more.
Mark Winger: 100+ Hours of Research Review of arguments in favour of inclusion and omission of these verses
John MacArthur: Sermon ‘A Fitting End to Mark’s Gospel’(Favours Omission of verses)
Ryle, pp265 – 272 (Favours inclusion of verses)
Wiersbe, pp184 – 187 (Favours inclusion of verses)










I have recently been blessed by the arrival of a Grandson. Of course, his arrival was not a complete surprise. It was a bit like Advent – we spent months looking forwards to his arrival. He is the first child for my son and his partner. He is indescribably special. I cannot put into words how I feel about this little one. He is indescribably beautiful. When I first met the little guy and held him, the emotions were almost overpowering. Ok, anyone who knows me is aware that I’m a pretty emotional person, but the moment was beyond special. I truly love that child. But I have to acknowledge, however, powerful my ‘Grandad’ love is, it is sort of dwarfed by that of my Grandson’s Mum and Dad. 


