Tag Archives: scourging

Beaten, Mocked and Abused: Mark 15:15-20

Jesus. Beaten, mocked and abused.

15 Wanting to satisfy the crowd, Pilate released Barabbas to them. He had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified. 16 The soldiers led Jesus away into the palace (that is, the Praetorium) and called together the whole company of soldiers. 17 They put a purple robe on him, then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on him. 18 And they began to call out to him, “Hail, king of the Jews!” 19 Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. 20 And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.

Mark 15:15-20

Horsham: 19th December 2025

I’m not sure we should feel sorry for Pilate.  He made it abundantly clear that he found no reason to punish Jesus – certainly not to put him to death. He symbolically washed his hands – a public spectacle intended to show that he was not responsible. That all sounds good, but then, ‘wanting to satisfy the crowd,‘ he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified. Roman flogging, or scourging, was a barbaric punishment on its own, intended to humiliate and seriously injure the prisoner.

Pilate was normally based in Caesarea. He was almost certainly in Jerusalem primarily because of the heightened risk of unrest during the Passover. When in Jerusalem he based himself at the Praetorium, which is believed to be the former palace of Herod the Great. Having flogged Jesus, it was into this palace that Pilate brought a large number of soldiers from the garrison. A literal translation of the text says that ‘the whole cohort’ was summonsed, which would have been over 450 soldiers. At first sight, this looks like a huge number to come and guard Jesus – but as ever, we need to look at the context.

Outside the Praetorium there is a mob, baying for the blood of Jesus. Pilate has just been forced to release a revolutionary leader name Barabbas, who might potentially whip up patriotic fervour into that volatile crowd. The Romans are about to execute the one who was recently welcomed into Jerusalem as ‘King of the Jews’.

Seen against the background of a city  filled to capacity with hundreds of thousands of visitors for the Passover and it starts to look not just likely, but probable, that Pilate was anxious to have all his resources immediately to hand. He has every reason to ensure that his forces are on high alert. Suddenly, 450 armed men doesn’t sound so unlikely.

Jesus has been scourged. He is bleeding and helpless. He can barely stand or walk without support. He is now in the Praetorium with a large number of soldiers. Perhaps it is not surprising that in that environment he becomes the target of abuse and amusement for his guards. The purple robe. The crown of thorns. The rod or staff in his hand. These are done as a joke. Entertainment. These soldier are not Judaean. The Jews regard them as an enemy and the feeling is mutual. In mockery they call Jesus ‘King of the Jews’, paying him false homage as they spit in his face and beat him with staves. He is just a prisoner waiting to be executed. He is nothing to them. It’s probable that the courtyard where this takes place will be echoing with laughter.

Then, when the time comes to take him to Golgotha, they are called to order. Their moment of fun is over. The blood stained robe is removed. He had been stripped naked for his flogging. Only now do ‘they put his clothes back on him’ (v20) – in his weakened state he is probably incapable of dressing himself.

I don’t think that we should feel sorry for Pilate. Washing his hands did not absolve him of the responsibility for his part in all this. And yet I wonder whether Pilate might not have been amongst the crowd of people in the mind of the one who said ‘Forgive them, LORD. They know not what they do.’

End Piece

We often read portions of this story without reading the whole  story, and so we miss the speed of events at the end of Christ’s life. In Mark’s Gospel, the events of Holy Week – turning over tables, arguments with Jewish Leaders, trips to Bethany, preparations for the Passover – build a sense of gathering pace.

We miss the fact that the crucifixion took place just a few hours after the arrest in Gethsemane. Artistic representations of the scenes before the High Priest, before Pilate, before Herod, on the road to the cross, rarely portray the horror of the beatings. which preceded these events. They somehow seem to gloss over the true brokenness of Jesus, the man.

It is a hard fact that such treatment was not unique to Christ. Others who found themselves on the wrong side of Roman justice suffered similar torture and abuse. Nonetheless, we need to understand the brokenness of Jesus as he was prepared on that morning for his execution. Jesus was wholly man. It was events to come which make the difference. It is the events to come which set him apart and leave no doubt that this man was truly the Son of God.

Richard Jackson, West Sussex:

Scourging of Christ: Mark 15:15

‘After scourging him, Pilate  gave Jesus over to be crucified..’  Mark 15:15

Horsham: 17th December 2025

The purpose of this post is to look for the context of the phrase ‘After scourging him…‘ It’s a phrase which is hugely meaningful in the context of the story of the events leading up to the crucifixion of Jesus. The horror of this phrase almost hides in plain sight. We pass over it without noticing it. We simply don’t understand the level of violence hidden within that phrase.

I’ve drawn on various sources, listed below, to explain what ‘scourging’ or ‘flogging’ would have involved in Roman Judea in the first century. This post explains what is likely to have happened to Jesus, and many other prisoners who were subsequently crucified in Jerusalem by the Roman occupiers. It is not comfortable reading.

In Mark 15:15 we read that before being handed over to be crucified, Pilate, who found no fault in Jesus,  caused Jesus to be flogged . The Greek word used in Mark 15:15 is phragellosas (φραγελλώσας). This word is commonly translated as ‘flogged‘, or more accurately ‘having flogged [him]’. It is also commonly translated as ‘scourged’. For me, this somehow better describes the actual process to which we reasonably believe Christ was subjected.

Scourging is a specific style of flogging. The purpose is to incapacitate and humiliate the prisoner. Scourging was not invented by the Romans, but they perfected their own style of using this violent punishment and torture. It is a despicable punishment.

ROMAN SCOURGING

Throughout Roman history there were many variations of style, so we can’t be sure which type of whip was used on Jesus. However, we can reasonably imagine a leather whip, with a strong, solid handle up to 0.5m long. To will have been joined to a number of strands, usually made of leather, into which have been woven sharp pieces of stone, bone and metal. The Romans called it a flagrum or flagellum. 

Depiction of the Roman Flagrum or Flagellum, used in scourging
Depiction of the Roman Flagrum or Flagellum, used in scourging

The flagrum was sometimes used as a punishment of slaves and low level offenders, who would carry the scars of their beating for the rest of their lives as a warning to others. The message was simple. ‘Behave. Or this could happen to you.’ 

There is evidence that the Romans would also use the flagrum to prepare a prisoner for crucifixion, rendering them helpless to resist their fate. After this beating, it was common to make the prisoner carry at least part of their cross to the place of execution. It is almost certainly because of the wounds from this beating that Jesus was unable to carry any part of his own cross (Matthew 27:31-32 Mark 15:21-22).

The process is horrific. The prisoner was stripped naked, before either being tied to a pillar or laid flat on the ground, with his hands and feet extended. To keep control of the prisoner, he would be tied in position. The target area was the back, buttocks, and the back of the legs above the knee. Two guards, each in possession of a flagrum stood, one on each side of the prisoner, taking it in turns to deliver a blow. The strands of the whip strike the body, with the sharpened additions cutting deep into the flesh. Over and over again the prisoner is thrashed by the whips. Roman law placed no limit on the number of times a prisoner could be whipped. The flesh would be torn to shreds, often exposing bone. The force of the impacts could cause catastrophic damage to internal organs. The prisoner, overwhelmed with the pain and suffering shock through loss of blood,  will inevitably lose consciousness. 

Roman soldiers using the flagrum were masters of their art. Scourging can easily kill the prisoner, and often did. However, when the prisoner was to face crucifixion, a third soldier would monitor the condition of the victim, pausing or stopping the beating before the prisoner succumbed completely. 

SCOURGING OF JESUS

In the case of Jesus, the guards have  almost certainly been told to keep Jesus alive, although we should not doubt that he was beaten within an inch of his life.

Jesus had been beaten even before he was delivered to Pilate (Mark 14:65). Now he has been scourged by the Romans. His skin will have been shredded. His muscles, and potentially internal organs, will have been severely damaged.  He will be suffering from shock. He will be physically shaking. He will scarcely  be able to stand without support.

We have already mentioned that for the Romans, this type of flogging was a common precursor to execution. Nonetheless, it has been suggested that in scourging Jesus, Pilate was making one final attempt to  encourage the crowd to feel sympathy for Jesus and give him the reason to release him. If that was the case, his attempt failed. 

‘After scourging him, Pilate  gave Jesus over to be crucified..’  

Bible History.com
Three Thirty Ministries
Shroud.com (‘The Hypotheses about the Roman Flagrum’, by F Manservigi (stlmanservigipaper.pdf))
Various additional sources which quote from the writings of Josephus, Philo and Eusabius.

Richard Jackson, West Sussex